Hire offshore AI and data engineers

Engineers screened for systems that reached production and stayed there, not for notebooks and demos. Embedded in your team, employed by us.

The hiring problem in this discipline

AI is the one area where a portfolio misleads most reliably. A convincing prototype can be assembled quickly, and the distance between that and a system that behaves acceptably in front of real users, on real data, at real volume, is enormous. Most hiring processes in this space do not test for the distance.

So the screening question we care about is not what somebody has built. It is what happened after they shipped it: what was measured, how it failed, what the evaluation looked like, what got rolled back and why. Engineers who have genuinely owned a system in production answer those questions immediately and specifically. Engineers who have not, do not.

Roles we staff

A note on titles: they overlap and the market uses them loosely. Brief the work, not the title. We will tell you which of the above the brief actually describes, and sometimes the answer is that you want a strong backend engineer rather than an AI specialist.

Where the honest limits are

Three things we will say before you ask, because they decide fit more often than skill does.

Data, IP and access

Access follows the permissions you set and can be revoked by you. Confidentiality and intellectual property assignment are agreed in writing before work begins, and production data belongs out of development environments as a matter of practice regardless of geography. Our fuller treatment is in protecting IP and data in offshore development.

How the hire works

  1. Brief, day 1 to 2. The system, not just the stack. What it has to do, what data exists, what counts as good, and who will evaluate it.
  2. Shortlist, by day 7. Screened candidates with notes on what they have actually run in production.
  3. You interview. We recommend a systems conversation over a take-home, because the take-home tests exactly the thing that is easiest to fake in this discipline.
  4. Onboarding, week 2 to 4. Access, data context, and the evaluation criteria written down.
  5. Review at 90 days against what you wrote at the start.

Cost

We do not publish rates; the honest figure depends on seniority and on how specialised the brief is. The rate is inclusive of employment, payroll, insurance and benefits, so compare it against your fully loaded employer cost rather than a salary. Work yours out on the cost calculator, then ask us for the rate card against your specific role.

Questions

AI engineer, ML engineer or data scientist?

The titles overlap. Broadly: AI engineers build applications on existing models, ML engineers train and deploy models and own the pipeline, data scientists sit closer to analysis and experimentation. Describe the work and we will name the role.

How do you screen for this?

By asking what happened after the system shipped, not what it looked like in a demo. Evaluation, failure modes, what was measured in production, what got rolled back.

Who employs the engineer?

We do, through our registered entity in the United Kingdom, the UAE or Pakistan. You direct the work; we carry the employment, payroll and compliance.

Start with the system, not the title

Tell us what it has to do and what data you have. We will tell you which role that is, including when the answer is that you do not need an AI specialist yet.